|
 
Hold
the mouse
over any of the thumbnails for
the caption!

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12
|

Determination of the mechanism responsible
for
fractures in two pump crankshafts.
- 1. Introduction
- 1.1
- A request was received for an investigation to be carried
out on the subject crankshafts to determine why they had fractured
after approximately one year in service (It was reported that
pumps of the same type are still running satisfactorily after
approaching ten years in service).
- 1.2
- Information provided with the fractured shafts stated that
they had been manufactured from rolled low alloy steel bar
to specification BS970 817M40 supplied in the annealed condition
and subsequently heat treated by oil quenching from 850°C
followed by tempering at 650°C. This heat treatment would
be expected to give a tensile strength of approximately 1000
N/mm² (65 tonf/in²). In order to produce the crankshafts
the bar would need to be greater than 225 mm in diameter.
- 2. Examination and Experimental
Results
- Visual and macroscopic examination of the crankshafts in
the as received condition gave the following information:
- (a)
- The crankshafts were three throw and both had fractured
at the junction of the connecting rod big end journal with
the related crank on one side at the centre throw position.
The crankshaft bearing journal had been cut from the same
end on both shafts. The fracture was at the journal to crank
junction furthest from this end.
- (b)
- The fracture faces on both shafts were typical of those
produced by a high cycle, low stress fatigue mechanism (see
Plates 01, 02, 11 and 12). Multiple fatigue initiation points
were present in the journal to crank junctions in both cases.
- (c)
- The side faces of the cranks had been machined by turning
down to protruding lands at each end of each big end journal.
These lands, a generous blend-in radius and the journals had
been finished by grinding.
- (d)
- The faces of the lands and the blend-in radii had been finished
by flank grinding and there was considerable evidence of 'chatter'
in the radius.
- 2.2
- Vickers hardness tests were carried out on the turned side
face of the crank and on the surface of the ground flank at
the fracture position on Crankshaft 2 with the following results:
Ground land
305, 311, 402 HV(2.5)
Turned surface
- 311, 322, 322 HV(2.5)
The scatter in hardness at the land position indicates that
machining abuse (grinding burns) may have taken place.
- 2.3
- The journal surface and the surface of the blend-in radius
and adjacent ground land at the fracture position on Crankshaft
1 were etched in 5% aqueous nitric acid. This clearly showed
that rehardening and temper burns were present in the surface
of the land and that untempered martensite was present in
the surface of the radius (see Plates 04 to 06 inclusive).
It must be remembered that abusively machined surfaces contain
residual stresses resulting from both the thermal disturbance
and differences in volume between untempered and tempered
martensite. In addition, a layer of very soft material is
always present under the untempered martensite due to the
temperature gradient between the surface and the core material
when the grinding abuse takes place. Both these conditions
considerably reduce fatigue resistance.
- 2.4
- Examination of a microsection prepared from material cut
from the position on Crankshaft 1 indicated on Plates 03 and
06 showed that the material was coarse grained and that it
contained non-metallic inclusions which were mainly of manganese
sulphide (see Plate 7). Such inclusions form stress raisers
where they break out to the surface in sensitive regions,
e.g. journal to crank blend-in radii and can also reduce fatigue
resistance.
- 2.5
- Following etching to confirm the presence of grinding 'burns',
a magnetic crack test was carried out on one of the other
big end journals on Crankshaft 1. A large crack was indicated
at the edge of the blend-in radius (see Plates 08 to 10 inclusive).
- 3. Conclusions
- 3.1
- It is considered that the fractures on both the subject
crankshafts were the result of a high cycle, low stress fatigue
mechanism in service. It is also considered that the resistance
of the shafts to the normal fatigue loading experienced in
service had been considerably reduced by the presence of machining
abuse (in this case grinding 'burns') in the blend-in radii
between the big end journals and the adjacent cranks where
fracture initiated.
|
|